About the Blogmaster
Tim Maddog was abducted by aliens several years ago and is now secretly blogging from an island where even the domestic media doesn't know its name.
Before his abduction he helped to create The Sedition Commission, actively opposed an infamous racist political candidate, hosted his very own weekly radio show (where he was threatened by backers of the aforementioned candidate), and fought the College Republicans singlehandedly. During the 1980s and 90s he published the 'zine Vital Information.
Tim Maddog is an atheist, a vegetarian, a non-drinker, and a bicyclist. If you don't use your rear view mirror when driving alongside him, he will rip it off of your car with his bare hands. If you're an extra-large uniformed soldier, and you crash your motorcycle into him, be prepared for an ass-whoopin'. He's a Maddog! On the other hand, if you smile at him, he'll smile back at you. (See more on my Blogger profile)
The name of the rap?
The name of this blog comes from the title of a rap done by Tim Maddog on The Sedition Commission's An Ambient Boot to the Head. Listen to it online here.
Maddog Quotes
* Question everything -- especially this.
* My race is human. What's yours?
* They cannot control us!
* Part of the real secret is that "us" includes you.
* Ignorance is bliss, and I'm pissed.
* I only eat live meat.
* Everything in moderation -- even moderation itself. (...though I'm apparently not the first to have said it.)
Search INDIAC
The Best of INDIAC
- The 9 lives of "Chemical Ali"
- Kill, kill, kill
- SOP: Don't ask questions
- The vapor trails of 9/11
- Grilling Gilligan
- Botox as a WMD
- The truth about "mint tea"
- Why we write
- Wu'er Kaixi's lobotomy
- "Ethnic divisiveness" in Taiwan
- Shooting down "Bulletgate": i, ii, iii, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13, Part 14, Part 15, Part 16, Part 17 (and even more to come!)
- - - - - - - - - - -
Links
- 228 Massacre in US Media
- A-Changin' Times
- Adbusters
- Altercation
- AlterNet
- AmericaBlog
- Anarchist Defense League
- Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed
- Atrios' Eschaton
- BartCop Political Commentary
- Black Box Voting
- Bloggence, Cunning, Exile
- Bloggers In Taiwan
- Boondocks
- Buck Fush
- Bush Lies
- Bush Recall
- Bushflash
- BuyBlue.org
- BuzzFlash
- Center for American Progress
- Choose the Blue
- Clever Claire
- Crooks and Liars
- Cursor
- Democracy Now!
- Democratic Forum Bush Polls
- Democratic Underground
- Disinfopedia
- Doubting to Shuo
- Dreams of Life
- Enemy of the Earth
- Factsheet5
- FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting)
- Free Inquiry
- From the Wilderness
- Get Your War On
- GNN (Guerrilla News Network)
- Independent Media Center
- Information Clearing House
- Jerome F. Keating's Writings
- Joe Conason
- Life of Brian
- London Calling
- Media Matters for America
- Michael Moore
- My Blahg
- NORML
- One Whole Jujuflop Situation
- Pagebao
- Politics & Science
- Public Library of Science
- Reverend Mykeru
- Rotten.com - Conspiracies
- SullyWatch
- Sutton Impact (formerly "Schlock'N'Roll")
- Taiwan Blog Feed
- Taiwan Today
- Take Back the Media
- Ted Rall
- The Hutton Inquiry
- The Levitator
- The Lost Spaceman
- The Memory Hole
- The Poison Dart
- The Rude Pundit
- The Taiwan Library Online
- The View from Taiwan
- The Wayback Machine
- Think Progress
- This Modern World
- THOMAS
- Today's Front Pages
- Troubletown
- TomPaine.com
- Wandering to Tamshui
- What Really Happened
- WhiteHouse.org
- Wikipedia
- Working for Change
- Google News
- - - - - - - - - - -
My Taiwan shitlist
Be careful with these motherfuckers who disguise themselves as "journalists." They're armed with memes like "renegade province" and aren't afraid to use them. If any of 'em ever see me, they'd better get on the other side of the fucking street.
Why do they hate Taiwan?
- Mike "I want my KMT" Chinoy
- William "Bulletgate" Pesek, Jr.
- Keith "Dime Novel" Bradsher
- Bevin "Anti-War (except when it comes to Taiwan)" Chu
INDIAC Archives
- January 2000
- July 2003
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- February 2011
- August 2011
- February 2016
"Pay close attention to that man behind the curtain!"
Thursday, October 28, 2004
Taiwan's opposition reinforces smug image
Accuses ruling party of being smug
Early Wednesday afternoon, I saw Lien Chan on the news, smirking proudly as he accused the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of overestimating their greatness (paraphrased: "Min jin dang jue de ta men na mo wei da de").
This was Lien's joyous response to Colin Powell's recent comments that "Taiwan is not a sovereign state." Instead of attacking Powell -- or even the idiotic statements -- the opposition pan-blue parties are using this as yet another excuse to attack the pan-greens' plan to implement a NT$610.8 billion (US$18.23 billion) budget for the purchase of defensive weapons in order to counter the continually growing threat of Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan.
The irony of this is that the very budget the pan-blues are now adamantly opposing was, in fact, requested by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT or Kuomintang) when they were in power. (Talk about two-faced!)
Also, one must recall that when Singapore scolded Taiwan at the United Nations, the DPP-appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs (Chen Tang-shan, AKA Mark Chen) accused Singapore of "holding China's balls" (i.e., "brown-nosing"), the KMT attacked the DPP instead of standing up for Taiwan and pointing out the absurdity of the accusation that Taiwan is any kind of threat to peace in the region.
Additionally, one cannot forget that legislative elections are coming up, and the pan-greens are working hard at gaining a majority, looking more and more confident as the days pass. The pan-blues, on the other hand, are looking more and more like cartoon figures clinging for dear life onto a bare branch protruding from the face of a cliff.
Further acts of desperation
The pan-blues will do absolutely anything to try to beat the pan-greens -- anything except introspection, that is.
While Typhoon Nock-Ten (Laotian for "bird") was lashing at Taiwan on Monday, a TTV camera operator said to be covering Premier Yu Shyi-kun's visit to a water diversion project drowned. (Government Information Office (GIO) Director Lin Chia-lung, however, says "that the media did not go to the scene to cover the premier's trip but to cover the activation of the Yuanshanzih floodwater diversion channel.") The pan-blues immediately used this event to attack Yu, blaming him for the journalist's death and calling his visit to the location a "political stunt."
There are several problems with this. The cameraman, Alex Ping, had been warned earlier to leave the area due to rising water. He and others had crossed rising waters after being told not to -- probably in an attempt to get more dramatic footage of the rapidly rising waters.
During recent typhoons, I've commented to my wife about the idiotic behavior of reporters who put on "stunts" of their own: staging "pratfalls" to demonstrate the danger of navigating Taiwan's flooded streets; standing on the beach as huge waves and powerful winds batter them, all the while saying how "dangerous" it is (not to mention "stupid"); and exaggerating the existing conditions for the sake of "shock value" (e.g., during a light rain, a reporter left the hood of his raincoat covering half his face, all the while grimacing as if it were the fault of the weather).
I cannot say with 100 percent certainty if Ping was doing such a thing, but the behavior mentioned above certainly gives viewers reason to wonder. If reporters had the reputation of giving accurate, honest reports, this doubt would not exist. If journalists would adhere to some basic safety guidelines, such unfortunate incidents might not happen so frequently.
Early Wednesday afternoon, I saw Lien Chan on the news, smirking proudly as he accused the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of overestimating their greatness (paraphrased: "Min jin dang jue de ta men na mo wei da de").
This was Lien's joyous response to Colin Powell's recent comments that "Taiwan is not a sovereign state." Instead of attacking Powell -- or even the idiotic statements -- the opposition pan-blue parties are using this as yet another excuse to attack the pan-greens' plan to implement a NT$610.8 billion (US$18.23 billion) budget for the purchase of defensive weapons in order to counter the continually growing threat of Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan.
The irony of this is that the very budget the pan-blues are now adamantly opposing was, in fact, requested by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT or Kuomintang) when they were in power. (Talk about two-faced!)
Also, one must recall that when Singapore scolded Taiwan at the United Nations, the DPP-appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs (Chen Tang-shan, AKA Mark Chen) accused Singapore of "holding China's balls" (i.e., "brown-nosing"), the KMT attacked the DPP instead of standing up for Taiwan and pointing out the absurdity of the accusation that Taiwan is any kind of threat to peace in the region.
Additionally, one cannot forget that legislative elections are coming up, and the pan-greens are working hard at gaining a majority, looking more and more confident as the days pass. The pan-blues, on the other hand, are looking more and more like cartoon figures clinging for dear life onto a bare branch protruding from the face of a cliff.
Further acts of desperation
The pan-blues will do absolutely anything to try to beat the pan-greens -- anything except introspection, that is.
While Typhoon Nock-Ten (Laotian for "bird") was lashing at Taiwan on Monday, a TTV camera operator said to be covering Premier Yu Shyi-kun's visit to a water diversion project drowned. (Government Information Office (GIO) Director Lin Chia-lung, however, says "that the media did not go to the scene to cover the premier's trip but to cover the activation of the Yuanshanzih floodwater diversion channel.") The pan-blues immediately used this event to attack Yu, blaming him for the journalist's death and calling his visit to the location a "political stunt."
There are several problems with this. The cameraman, Alex Ping, had been warned earlier to leave the area due to rising water. He and others had crossed rising waters after being told not to -- probably in an attempt to get more dramatic footage of the rapidly rising waters.
During recent typhoons, I've commented to my wife about the idiotic behavior of reporters who put on "stunts" of their own: staging "pratfalls" to demonstrate the danger of navigating Taiwan's flooded streets; standing on the beach as huge waves and powerful winds batter them, all the while saying how "dangerous" it is (not to mention "stupid"); and exaggerating the existing conditions for the sake of "shock value" (e.g., during a light rain, a reporter left the hood of his raincoat covering half his face, all the while grimacing as if it were the fault of the weather).
I cannot say with 100 percent certainty if Ping was doing such a thing, but the behavior mentioned above certainly gives viewers reason to wonder. If reporters had the reputation of giving accurate, honest reports, this doubt would not exist. If journalists would adhere to some basic safety guidelines, such unfortunate incidents might not happen so frequently.